Our end-to-end onscreen evaluation system offers a structured, secure, and efficient solution for remote assessment of answer sheets. It supports subjective evaluations with built-in guidelines and hints for teachers, enables double or triple evaluation based on program requirements, and allows uploading of question paper templates to control mark allocation. The system automates error checks in mark entry, ensures marking consistency through detailed evaluation logs, and supports both auto and manual distribution of digitized answer sheets with the flexibility to reallocate when needed. With secure storage, robust authentication, and graphical dashboards for real-time tracking, the platform streamlines the entire evaluation, tabulation, and result processing workflow—delivering accuracy, transparency, and reliability for institutions and educators.
Safeguards scanned answer sheets with encrypted access, secure backups, and fast retrieval, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality.
Support subjective assessments with mark allocation controls, question paper templates, and built-in evaluation guidelines for consistency.
Enable double or triple evaluation workflows based on program type, promoting fairness and accurate assessment outcomes.
Automatically identifies marking inconsistencies and entry errors, reducing human mistakes and improving result accuracy.
Auto-assign or manually distribute answer sheets to evaluators, with the option to reallocate sheets when necessary.
Includes secure authentication and built-in validation checks to prevent unauthorized changes and ensure reliable assessment.
Accelerates the evaluation-to-result pipeline with automated tabulation, reducing delays and ensuring timely publication of results.
Get started without any initial charges, giving institutions a hands-on trial to explore the platform before full implementation.
The Multilevel Evaluation Process ensures accuracy through three stages. Primary Evaluation uses independent evaluators with a standardized marking scheme. Secondary Evaluation involves a different set of evaluators reviewing without prior marks, enabling deviation tracking. Resolution Evaluation is triggered for discrepancies, where senior evaluators finalize marks, ensuring transparency and consistency.
Independent evaluators follow a standardized marking scheme, ensuring consistency and fairness, while automatic mark recording enhances accuracy and efficiency in the evaluation process.
A different set of evaluators assesses the answers without viewing previous marks, enabling unbiased comparative analysis and effective deviation tracking for accurate evaluation.
Triggered by mark deviation, the process involves a senior evaluator review, ensuring a comprehensive assessment that leads to accurate final mark determination.